need to read them critically, and that woman, I called that woman who wrote that
TIME magazine article, and I called the editor of
The Washington Post when they said, you know, “Well, this is the newest mythology, they’ve removed the Thimerisal from the vaccines and autism rates have not gone down.”
How many times have you read that repeated by these people from the press? That is an industry talking point that the industry knows is a lie—everybody knows that’s a lie. The amount of Thimerisal today in the flu vaccines is about sixty percent of what they claim to have removed from all the other pediatric vaccines. So, I looked at these, I read these studies, and I saw studies that weren’t even good—that wasn’t even high-quality fraud. It is low—these are low quality fraud, the worst—I mean, anybody, you don’t even need a scientist to advise you and tell you where the fraud is. And I’ll tell you what they—I’ll just tell you what one of them, the big one that they all rely on, the Danish study, where they said, okay, in 1992, Denmark banned Thimerisal. And after that, autism rates continued to climb. Therefore, there is no association between autism and Thimerosal. That’s the study.
What they didn’t tell you is that in 1992, Denmark was concerned about the
connection between Thimerisal and autism, and about this huge rise in autism, and it began for the first time requiring registering autism as a reported illness in Denmark. So all the people who had autistic children suddenly had to register them for the first time. Plus, in Copenhagen, they founded a new clinic to treat autistic kids, which gave people a huge financial incentive and health incentive to register their children. So it’s the registry that went up, not the incidents of autism that went up. But they didn’t say that in the study. They never mention the Copenhagen clinic. They never mention the change in the rules in Denmark.
They just show you the graphs, of Thimerisal is banned here, and autism continues to go up. Well, the reason the autism rates rose was because—was an artifact of their data collection processes. It had nothing to do with the reality on the ground of the occurrence of autism. So, and you’ve heard all of their other studies, and you know, they all have this guy Paul Offit. You guys know him? And he is the poster child for the term “biostitute.” This a man who has made himself the spokesperson for the vaccine industry. He portrays himself as an independent scientist, he does not disclose the millions of dollars of transactions.
Let me just close up by saying this,
that—and I started out by saying this—that, you know, they, these people, one of the worst crimes that they’ve done—and, you know, I’ve talked to
The New York Times, and I said, you know, “You guys had Judith Miller, you know, talking for a year about the Iraq War, and saying how what a great thing it is and covering up the truth from the government spokespeople.” And I said, “There’s no difference what you’re doing, and then you had to come out and apologize,” and the
Times publically apologized for that. And I said, “You’re going to have to apologize for this someday, for what you’ve done here. Because what you’ve done here, that war’s going to cost us three trillion dollars, but the treatment of these children, and cost to our society, from what you have done, from what you are doing to this generation of children, is going to far exceed the cost of the Iraq War.” And somebody is going to have to come to terms with that, and ultimately, the American press has completely let down our democracy.
And one of the things you see repeated again and again, is that these are, that the women, you know, who claim that their children—and I’ve gotten now hundreds and hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of letters, and that’s not hyperbole, that’s not exaggeration, from women who had the exact
